Once
you have determined a specific focus for the argument, then you need to develop
an opinion about that focus. In other words, you need to present an
argumentative opinion about the narrowly defined subject matter you have
selected.
This
point is critical. You cannot base an argument merely on the focus you have
defined. You must organize an opinion about that focus, something we can argue
about. This opinion is called the thesis, and it is the single most
important sentence or series of sentences in the entire argument.
For
example, you cannot base an argumentative essay on teenage alcoholism in BC or
on Ophelia in Hamlet or on the distribution of drugs in school. You must
base the essay on an opinion about one of those. And, in general, the sharper
the opinion and the more energetically you express it, the clearer the thesis
will be, both to you and to the reader or listener.
The
thesis should answer the question: What precisely is the presenter of this
argument trying to persuade me to believe? If that is not clear, then the
argument's central purpose is fuzzy or missing. So you need to take particular
care to conclude the introduction with a precise definition of your thesis.
When
you set out to do this, remember what we discussed in the previous section,
namely, that certain statements do not make good arguments, because there is
nothing we can usefully dispute in them. Make sure your thesis does not fall
into this category (a great many students weaken their argument fatally by
presenting a very poor thesis).
Notice,
for example, that the following statements would make very poor thesis
statements, because they are not sufficiently argumentative; they state matters
which we can quickly confirm by an appeal to the text or to an existing
authority:
1.
Acid rain hurts fish.
2.
Polonius is Ophelia's father, and when he dies, she goes insane.
3.
Teenage drinking is very common in BC.
4.
Bob Dylan started writing songs early in the 1960's.
These
sentences are useless as thesis statements, because they present nothing we can
usefully argue about. If that's all you offer at the end of your introduction,
then the reader is going to be very puzzled about why you are striving so hard
to argue about something obvious. Notice the difference between the above
statements and the following.
1.
Acid rain is the single most important threat to our quality of life, and thus
we must undertake decisive action against it immediately, no matter what the
cost.
2.
Polonius's treatment of his daughter reveals clearly just how poisonous the
emotional climate of Elsinore
really is. His attitude to life is the source of much of the evil in the court.
3.
Teenage alcoholism in BC is a vastly overrated problem. If there are
difficulties, these have been exaggerated in order to scare us into thinking we
are facing a new crisis.
4.
Bob Dylan's early lyrics introduced the most significant changes in song
writing since the early days of Tin Pan Alley. In one way or another, they have
decisively influenced almost every other major song writer in North
America ever since.
These
statements put something argumentative on the table. We can easily disagree (or
be reluctant to be persuaded), and the writer is going to have to work to
convince us. Such statements do not simply announce a matter of fact about
which we cannot argue significantly.
If
you don't set the essay up with a clearly argumentative thesis, then the logic
of the argument will be defective, because the reader will not be clear about
what you are trying to establish. Please make sure you understand this key
point. The failure to establish a good thesis is the single most important
logical error in student essays.