In
our society, for causes too complex to discuss here, we long ago determined
that the appropriate way in which arguments must be conducted and adjudicated
is through proper reasoning. We will be looking more closely at what this means
in later sections, but for the moment it is important to note that in making
this decision we, in effect, rejected various other traditional ways in which
arguments had been dealt with (e.g., by appeals to scriptural authority or to
traditional rituals based on hereditary power and privilege or to variously
irrational methods, like astrology, augury, the I Ching,
spiritual revelation, dunking, and so on).
Thus,
to construct effective arguments in the modern western world, one must, first
and foremost, have an understanding of the rules of reasoning. The major aim of
an undergraduate education in all disciplines is to develop such an
understanding in students.
Of
course, we are a liberal society, and we still allow people in their private
lives to resolve their arguments or make their private decisions (which often
amounts to much the same thing) in any manner they wish, short of inflicting
physical harm on others. So it is quite permissible in one's private affairs to
consult scripture, toss coins, use numerology, consult spirit mediums, or sit
around a Ouija board in order to resolve private arguments (once again,
however, all participants have to agree if the resolution is to be persuasive).
In
the public world of work, politics, education, and the media, however, the
primary requirement of an effective argument is that it must be rational (that
is, follow the rules of reason). Of course, in this public world there is often
a great deal of irrationality (e.g., in political speeches and in advertising).
An important part of being an educated citizen is possessing
the skill to recognize this irrationality, especially when it is posing as a
reasonable argument, since manipulating citizens through misleading arguments
is a major feature of modern life.
What
are these rules of reason? Well, that is what this handbook is largely
concerned with, at least on a fairly basic level. The sections which follow
offer some specific guidelines about the nature of a reasonable argument, about
how to produce one in an essay form, and about a number of the ways your
written argument can go astray. There is no attempt here to offer a
comprehensive treatment of what can be a very complex subject; at the same time
the different sections do cover much of what an undergraduate needs to know in
order to analyze and construct arguments.